Replace "could" and "might", Clauses 16-32. #4386
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@opensdh: Could you perhaps take a look at the filesystem changes? @geoffromer: Could you perhaps take a look at the atomics and threads changes? Thank you! |
opensdh
reviewed
Nov 23, 2020
geoffromer
reviewed
Nov 23, 2020
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <gromer@google.com>
… "risk" vs "possiblity" nuance of "might"
|
@CaseyCarter: could you perhaps take a look at the ranges and concepts, particularly with a view to whether "might->can" confuses risk with possibility? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These changes editorially remove the words "could" and "might".
Please review this change carefully with the following goals:
Flag anything that seems even remotely non-editorial, e.g. even if the explanation provided by a Note becomes less useful or (more) misleading.
Also flag anything that could conceivably be worded better by a wider review.
I would like all remaining instances of "could" and "might" to be reviewed by CWG/LWG, so please don't hold back on rejecting anything at this point.