Not so apparent. The "copy operation" in [class.copy]p31 means copy construction only, and the ones in [allocator.requirements] can be replaced by "copy assignment".

Also note that there are

• "copy or move operation" in [stmt.return]p2 and [iterator.requirements.general]p6
• "copy/move operation" in [class.copy]p31&32 and [except.throw]p5
• "move operation" in [allocator.requirements]p4&5.

If I'm not mistaken, only the "copy or move operation" in [iterator.requirements.general]p6 refers to both construction and assignment operation.

Note that a copy might be performed by something that is not a copy constructor as defined in 12.8 [class.copy]. Nowadays, we run full overload resolution on the constructors for the copy, and we might actually choose a constructor template (which is never a copy constructor) to perform the copy. Therefore, changing "copy/move operation" to "copy/move construction" should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

Editorial meeting: Change [fs.enum.copy.opts] to use "file copy operation".
Use of "copy operation" in core language sections is fine (contrasts with "move operation").
The two in allocator requirements: the first is "copy assignment operation" clearly, and the second one is "copy assignment operation", too. Also change "move operation" to "move assignment operation". Also change "move operation" in p4.

[lib.types.movedfrom] use "move constructors and move assignment operators". Also drop "shall".

22.2.1p7 [iterator.requirements.general] "Whether singular or not, use of a value-initialized iterator ..." Assignment has two objects involved; are we discussing the source or target? Turn in this into a bulleted list. "whereby the singular value is overwritten"
--> "operation" -> "constructor or assignment operator/operation" and open a new issue that the wording is unclear.