@jwakely, @CaseyCarter: could you perhaps take a look at this? Jens and I thought that those introductions of "meaningful names for the purpose of stating requirements" would look much more manageable as a list rather than as an every-expanding sentence.

@CaseyCarter: yes, we have long wanted to do something about the tables, and this is only the very first step. Stay tuned for more! :-)

@CaseyCarter: yes, we have long wanted to do something about the tables, and this is only the very first step. Stay tuned for more! :-)

I was referring specifically and only to the bulleted-list-of-names change. We only dislike the paragraphs of names. The tables themselves have a much more storied history of hatred and vitriol. (I've starred the notification for the table PR in my inbox to remind me to take a look at it over the weekend.)