Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[string.cons] Adjust wording to match [sequence.reqmts] #452

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cpplearner
Copy link
Contributor

LWG 1234 changed 23.2.3 [sequence.reqmts]/14+15 to say "shall not participate in overload resolution". 21.4.2[string.cons]/13 should be reworded accordingly.

LWG 1234 changed 23.2.3 [sequence.reqmts]/14+15 to say "shall not participate in overload resolution". 21.4.2[string.cons]/13 should be reworded accordingly.
@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Mar 13, 2015

Although I agree it should be changed, I don't think this is editorial so should be reported as an LWG issue.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Apr 14, 2015

Not editorial, please file an LWG issue, see http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#submit_issue

@jwakely jwakely closed this Apr 14, 2015
@cpplearner cpplearner deleted the string.cons branch March 12, 2016 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants