Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[expr.prim.lambda] Replace 'unnamed' with 'unique name' #4615

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented May 29, 2021

Also add a definition of 'unique name' in [intro.defs].

As discussed in the thread starting at http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2021/05/11017.php

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented May 31, 2021

Let's wait a few more days. CWG has been discussing this and seems to agree, but that's only recent, and not everyone may have had a chance to catch up with the discussion.

@RemindMeBot: come back June 5 please.

Also add a definition of 'unique name' in [intro.defs].
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Jun 1, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking. label Aug 24, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Discussed by CWG https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2021/IssuesProcessingTeleconference2021-08-24

Absent a compelling reason for 'unique name', 'unnamed' is the better phrasing.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer closed this Aug 24, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c3 branch August 24, 2021 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants