You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In most places in the standard, where we talk about a reference being initialized with an expression or a temporary object, we say "the reference binds to the expression" and similar things. However, we also say all of these things:
the expression binds to the reference (in only about 3 places)
the reference is bound to the expression
the expression is bound to the reference
It'd be nice if we were more consistent here. I think the right viewpoint is that references bind to expressions, not the other way around, but if so, is it correct to say that expressions are bound to references or that they are bound to by references or something else?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think @languagelawyer is right; reference should bind to objects and/or functions. Of course, an expression may yield an lvalue that designates an object or function to which the reference binds.
In most places in the standard, where we talk about a reference being initialized with an expression or a temporary object, we say "the reference binds to the expression" and similar things. However, we also say all of these things:
It'd be nice if we were more consistent here. I think the right viewpoint is that references bind to expressions, not the other way around, but if so, is it correct to say that expressions are bound to references or that they are bound to by references or something else?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: