Fix several index entries. #483
Conversation
Eelis
changed the title
Eelis
changed the title
Eelis
force-pushed
the
trivial
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1454ecd
to
bc8ffd9
Compare
| @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ | |||
| \indextext{conventions!lexical|(}% | |||
| \indextext{compilation!separate|(}% | |||
| The text of the program is kept in units called | |||
| \indextext{source file}\term{source files} in this International | |||
| \defnx{source files}{source file} in this International | |||
|
The diffs look good to me, thanks. @tkoeppe Would you mind looking over the built standard to double-check? |
| \index{grammar}% | ||
| \index{summary, syntax}% | ||
| \indextext{grammar}% | ||
| \indextext{summary, syntax}% |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a reason this is summary, syntax rather than summary!syntax?
|
Generally a good change. Two nitpicks, see above. The change replaces the low-level |
|
Thanks for the review and suggestions! I've re-pushed the branch with amended commits fixing the issues. |
|
The changes look good! |
|
Ah, thanks, I'll look into it. |
…the one in [expr.unary.op].
|
It was simply because [except.ctor]p1 actually defines "stack unwinding" as a term with a proper index entry. So there is no need for a "see" index entry for stack unwinding in the first place. :) I've amended the commit that tried to fix that "see" index entry, to no longer try to fix it, and added a separate commit to remove it. |
|
Sounds good, thanks! @zygoloid: I think this is ready for merging. |
| @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |||
| \rSec0[intro]{General} | |||
|
|
|||
| \indextext{diagnostic message|see{message, diagnostic}}% | |||
| \indexdefn{conditionally-supported behavior!see{behavior, conditionally-supported}}% | |||
| \indexdefn{conditionally-supported behavior|see{behavior, conditionally-supported}}% | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When to use indexdefn vs. indextext? Looking in macros.tex, they seem to be equivalent.
Currently, yes, but indexdefn has more semantic meaning, and could in theory be formatted differently in future. |
No description provided.