Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[class.base.init] Clarify implicitly-defined copy/move constructors #4918

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 25, 2021
Merged

[class.base.init] Clarify implicitly-defined copy/move constructors #4918

merged 1 commit into from Sep 25, 2021

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Sep 18, 2021 •
edited

Those do not have a (grammatical) mem-initializer-list,
yet they ignore default member initializers.

Fixes #4916

@jensmaurer
[class.base.init] Clarify implicitly-defined copy/move constructors
da1369b 
Those do not have a (grammatical) mem-initializer-list,
yet they ignore default member initializers.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit d9bd2a6 into cplusplus:main Sep 25, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c36 branch September 25, 2021 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[class.base.init] p9 is not suitable for implicitly defined copy/move constructor
2 participants
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe