[std] Fix cross-references to 'unevaluated operand' #4941

jensmaurer · 2021-09-26T19:49:29Z

jensmaurer · 2021-09-26T20:01:12Z

@tkoeppe, this only fixes and adds cross-references for "unevaluated operand", as a first step. It should be pretty obvious.

There is some follow-on work, because we sometimes mean "not potentially evaluated" (which also covers subexpressions). That needs separate work.

jensmaurer · 2021-10-21T10:29:14Z

Rebased.

@tkoeppe , ready for you.

tkoeppe added the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Oct 20, 2021

[std] Fix cross-references to 'unevaluated operand'

e1bb9a2

jensmaurer force-pushed the c13 branch from 10dd6fe to e1bb9a2 Compare October 21, 2021 10:29

jensmaurer removed the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Oct 21, 2021

jensmaurer added this to the post-2021-10 milestone Oct 21, 2021

tkoeppe merged commit 4bffacc into cplusplus:main Oct 21, 2021

jensmaurer deleted the c13 branch October 21, 2021 14:17

languagelawyer mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2021

\iref{term.unevaluated.operand} is handled as a reference to [term.unevaluated.operand] section which doesn't exist Eelis/cxxdraft-htmlgen#91

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[std] Fix cross-references to 'unevaluated operand' #4941

[std] Fix cross-references to 'unevaluated operand' #4941

jensmaurer commented Sep 26, 2021 •

edited

jensmaurer commented Sep 26, 2021 •

edited

jensmaurer commented Oct 21, 2021 •

edited

[std] Fix cross-references to 'unevaluated operand' #4941

[std] Fix cross-references to 'unevaluated operand' #4941

Conversation

jensmaurer commented Sep 26, 2021 • edited

jensmaurer commented Sep 26, 2021 • edited

jensmaurer commented Oct 21, 2021 • edited

jensmaurer commented Sep 26, 2021 •

edited

jensmaurer commented Sep 26, 2021 •

edited

jensmaurer commented Oct 21, 2021 •

edited