Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Editorial: "sub-clause" vs "subclause" #497

Closed
mclow opened this issue May 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Editorial: "sub-clause" vs "subclause" #497

mclow opened this issue May 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@mclow
Copy link
Contributor

mclow commented May 7, 2015

The standard uses the term "subclause" 107 times, and "sub-clause" 7 times.
It also uses "section" 102 times.

At the very least, the uses of "sub-clause" should be changed to "subclause", but changing the mentions of "section" might be considered as well.
@payload
Copy link
Contributor

payload commented Oct 27, 2016

For the "section" case, there is only section~\ref, never Section~\ref and once Sections~\ref. You can use grep -hosP '\b(-|\w)+~\\ref' *tex | sort -u to see the situation.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Nov 14, 2016 •
edited

Leaving the 'section' vs. 'subclause' discussion to #307 and #904.

jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2016
@jensmaurer
Replace 'sub-clause' by 'subclause'
0954bb7 
Fixes cplusplus#497.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 14, 2016
Merged
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2016
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe
Replace 'sub-clause' by 'subclause' (#1040)
72cc920 
Fixes #497.
@alexanderkscott alexanderkscott mentioned this issue Dec 31, 2016
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@payload @mclow @jensmaurer