Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2077R3 Heterogeneous erasure overloads for associative containers #5020

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2021

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2021-10 milestone Oct 9, 2021
source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/containers.tex Show resolved Hide resolved
source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Oct 16, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Oct 18, 2021
\begin{itemize}
\item \tcode{eq(r1, kx) == eq(kx, r1)},
\item \tcode{hf(r1) == hf(kx)} if \tcode{eq(r1, kx)} is \tcode{true},
\item \tcode{(eq(r1, kx) \&\& eq(r1, r2)) == eq(r2, kx)}, and
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this condition right? Can't eq(r2, kx) hold, but eq(r1, r2) and eq(r1, rx) could be false?

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit c3a973b into main Oct 20, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2021-10-lwg-13 branch July 29, 2022 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants