Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[basic.def.odr] Introduce label 'term.odr.use' and refer to it #5049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

instead of referring to 'basic.def.odr'. The latter breaks if we
ever move the definition of 'odr-use', e.g. to a subclause.

This new "term.x" convention is also documented in the wiki now.
Partially addresses #4937

instead of referring to 'basic.def.odr'.  The latter breaks if we
ever move the definition of 'odr-use', e.g. to a subclause.
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

(no visible diff)

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Oct 21, 2021

Thanks -- I like the convention of starting the label names with "term"!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit ed7cb02 into cplusplus:main Oct 21, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c13 branch October 21, 2021 14:29
@Curefab
Copy link

Curefab commented Jan 19, 2022

All links to term.odr.use are broken on https://eel.is/c++draft/term.odr.use

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

That's Eelis/cxxdraft-htmlgen#91.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants