Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[atomics] Harmonize references to atomics operations tables #5154

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 21, 2022

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #5120

@@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@

\pnum
The following operations perform arithmetic computations.
The key, operator, and computation correspondence are identified
The key, operator, and computation correspondence is identified
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jensmaurer: Instead of having these perpetual "guess the association" games, how about we say "The correspondence among key, operator, and computation is identified..."?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed. Also using "specified", not "identified".

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit b5ce71b into cplusplus:main Feb 21, 2022
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c68 branch February 21, 2022 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[atomics.types.int] Reference [tab:atomics.types.int.comp]
3 participants