Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[format.arg] Fix the determination of T without cvref-qualifiers removed LWG3631 #5156

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[format.arg] Fix the determination of T without cvref-qualifiers removed LWG3631 #5156

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hewillk
Copy link
Contributor

@hewillk hewillk commented Dec 18, 2021

No description provided.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

This is not obviously an editorial fix. It seems the current wording would fall back to handle(v) for (e.g.) a const int argument type; with your change, it would instead initialize value with an int.

@hewillk hewillk closed this Dec 18, 2021
@hewillk
Copy link
Contributor Author

hewillk commented Dec 19, 2021

This is not obviously an editorial fix. It seems the current wording would fall back to handle(v) for (e.g.) a const int argument type; with your change, it would instead initialize value with an int.

It seems that using handle to deal with const int is not intentional. Is this an acceptable editorial fix or is it worth submitting an LWG?

@hewillk hewillk reopened this Dec 19, 2021
@CaseyCarter
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is LWG3631.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title [format.arg] Fix the determination of T without cvref-qualifiers removed [format.arg] Fix the determination of T without cvref-qualifiers removed LWG3631 Dec 19, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking. labels Dec 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@hewillk @jensmaurer @CaseyCarter