Skip to content

Direct non-static data member vs. non-static data member #5176

Open
@xmh0511

Description

@xmh0511

[class.derived.general] p2 says that

Members of a base class are also members of the derived class.

Analogously, we can say that

non-static data members of a base class are also non-static data members of the derived class.

This makes
[class.special] p7

For a class, its non-static data members, its non-virtual direct base classes, and, if the class is not abstract ([class.abstract]), its virtual base classes are called its potentially constructed subobjects.

and [class.base.init] p2

Unless the mem-initializer-id names the constructor's class, a non-static data member of the constructor's class, or a direct or virtual base of that class, the mem-initializer is ill-formed.

be non-reasonable(as far as I have found, maybe there are other paragraphs that have the same issue).

We should give a stricter extent as that

direct non-static data members...

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @xmh0511

        Issue actions

          Direct non-static data member vs. non-static data member · Issue #5176 · cplusplus/draft