Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[class.mem.general] only second use of "layout-compatible types" has xref to definition #5216

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Jan 20, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5218
Closed

[class.mem.general] only second use of "layout-compatible types" has xref to definition #5216

jwakely opened this issue Jan 20, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5218
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Jan 20, 2022

[class.mem.general] p23 refers to "layout-compatible types" without a cross-reference, then p25 refers to it again and cross-references [basic.types.general].

Should the xref move to p23? Or be in both p23 and p25?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[class.mem.general] Add cross-reference for 'layout-compatible type' jensmaurer/draft
2 participants
@jwakely @jensmaurer