You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some labels in defns, hyphens in a term translate into hyphens in the label:
[defns.direct-non-list-init]
[defns.expression-equivalent]
In other labels, they become periods:
[defns.prog.def.spec]
[defns.prog.def.type]
Finally we have some cases where the noun is dropped when abbreviating to form the label; in these cases we seem to consistently use a period rather than a hyphen:
[defns.cond.supp]
[defns.impl.defined]
[defns.locale.specific]
[defns.well.formed]
(That last category might make sense, because English style guides often say to omit the hyphens in compound adjectives when used without a noun, but we don't do that in the standard, eg: "the behavior is implementation-defined" not "the behavior is implementation defined".)
Some consistency here would be nice. Maybe the first two examples above should change from hyphens to periods?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In some labels in defns, hyphens in a term translate into hyphens in the label:
In other labels, they become periods:
Finally we have some cases where the noun is dropped when abbreviating to form the label; in these cases we seem to consistently use a period rather than a hyphen:
(That last category might make sense, because English style guides often say to omit the hyphens in compound adjectives when used without a noun, but we don't do that in the standard, eg: "the behavior is implementation-defined" not "the behavior is implementation defined".)
Some consistency here would be nice. Maybe the first two examples above should change from hyphens to periods?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: