Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remarks: vs. Remark: and Postconditions: vs. Postcondition: in library #529

Closed
timsong-cpp opened this issue Jul 25, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Remarks: vs. Remark: and Postconditions: vs. Postcondition: in library #529

timsong-cpp opened this issue Jul 25, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG.

Comments

@timsong-cpp
Copy link
Contributor

[structure.specifications] defines only Remarks: and Postconditions: elements, but the singular form Remark: and Postcondition: are also used throughout the library. (Effect:, OTOH, is only used in two lines in Table 28, the allocator requirements table.) This should be cleaned up.
@jwakely jwakely added the lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. label Mar 15, 2016
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #282.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jwakely @timsong-cpp @jensmaurer