P2071R2 Named universal character escapes #5368
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Pending plenary approval, of course. |
jensmaurer
requested changes
Mar 26, 2022
|
Also, please rebase on HEAD, squash the fixes, and force-push. Thanks. |
|
I'd like to complete this. It seems like a useful skill to learn for the committee and an additional way to contribute. Although I understand I may be making additional work for reviewers while I'm learning. I'll push all the requested updates to this soon, rebased against current HEAD. |
steve-downey
force-pushed
the
named-unicode
branch
from
4d62c07
to
6fb0dda
Compare
jensmaurer
requested changes
Mar 28, 2022
steve-downey
changed the title
steve-downey
force-pushed
the
named-unicode
branch
2 times, most recently
from
739a384
to
b0fabc6
Compare
jensmaurer
requested changes
Mar 30, 2022
steve-downey
force-pushed
the
named-unicode
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7e6c8fb
to
79cb4c9
Compare
|
I apologize for the extra work. Let me know if there's more to do. |
|
Thanks for looking after this. This looks good to me now. |
jensmaurer
requested changes
Apr 1, 2022
Wording for the paper P2071R2 Named universal character escapes, actually an alternate form of universal-character-name, as reviewed and approved by CWG. Not yet approved by plenary.
steve-downey
force-pushed
the
named-unicode
branch
from
79cb4c9
to
54ddfb1
Compare
|
Thanks, we're through. I'm not going to "Approve" this before the plenary motion for fear of someone accidentally merging this. |
|
Thank you so much for doing this work, I'm very sorry we didn't keep track of it better! |
|
I'll remember to flag something on the editorial reflector next time.
Unfortunately I was on vacation the week after plenary.
…On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 18:15 Thomas Köppe ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #5368 <#5368>.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5368 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAVNZ5RQSTHZ4YGVVFYP2MTVXWHBFANCNFSM5RV4NNQA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The wording as approved by CWG for P2071, including the control code alias table which would be tedious to reproduce. Uses a new code font macro for uname to clarify there is no internal invisible whitespace.
Fixes cplusplus/papers#798