You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
LWG issue 206 was voted into the working draft by LWG motion 1 in N2266, and this is reflected in the editor's report N2283.
However, the edits applied to the working draft seems to have omitted the requirement that void* operator new[](std::size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) "returns a pointer obtained as if acquired from the (possibly replaced) operator new[](std::size_t size)".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LWG issue 206 was voted into the working draft by LWG motion 1 in N2266, and this is reflected in the editor's report N2283.
However, the edits applied to the working draft seems to have omitted the requirement that
void* operator new[](std::size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&)
"returns a pointer obtained as if acquired from the (possibly replaced)operator new[](std::size_t size)
".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: