Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LWG 206 doesn't seem to have been applied correctly #543

Closed
timsong-cpp opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

LWG 206 doesn't seem to have been applied correctly #543

timsong-cpp opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@timsong-cpp
Copy link
Contributor

LWG issue 206 was voted into the working draft by LWG motion 1 in N2266, and this is reflected in the editor's report N2283.

However, the edits applied to the working draft seems to have omitted the requirement that void* operator new[](std::size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) "returns a pointer obtained as if acquired from the (possibly replaced) operator new[](std::size_t size)".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant