We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[dcl.fct.def.default] p2 says
the type T2 it would have had if it were implicitly declared.
This clause could be transformed to
If it were implicitly declared, it would have had the type T2.
IMHO, Is it a hybrid of past and present? Isn't the following more grammatically?
If it were implicitly declared, it would have the type T2.
Or
If it had been implicitly declared, it would have had the type T2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
[dcl.fct.def.default] p2 says
This clause could be transformed to
IMHO, Is it a hybrid of past and present? Isn't the following more grammatically?
Or
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: