[temp.dep.expr] p3 says

An id-expression is type-dependent if it is a template-id that is not a concept-id and is dependent;

Presumably, the "dependent" might mean type-dependent or/and value-dependent. However, whether an id-expression that is a template-id is type-dependent or not is being specified in this subclause. The value-dependent also cross-references to [temp.dep.expr]. [temp.dep.general] p1 just says an expression is either type-dependent or value-dependent with the reference to [temp.dep.expr] and [temp.dep.constexpr]. So, whether an id-expression that is a template-id is type-dependent or value-dependent is not clearly specified in their respect subclauses.

We should clearly define how a template-id is type-dependent in [temp.dep.expr] and how it is value-dependent in [temp.dep.expr] to avoid the circular reference without clarifying anything.

Unlike the clear definition of whether a concept-id is value-dependent in [temp.dep.expr]

An id-expression is value-dependent if:

• it is a concept-id and any of its arguments are dependent,

We do not have a clear definition for how a template-id is type-dependent. We should specify the relevant rule for template-id , which might be

An id-expression is type-dependent if it is a template-id that is not a concept-id and

• the terminal name of the template-id is dependent, or
• any of its template-arguments is dependent.