Skip to content

[over.best.ics.general] p6 is long #5825

Closed
@jwakely

Description

@jwakely
Member

p6 is a bit unwieldy ... should we split it up into bullets?

It was always a big wall of text with two notes and an example in the middle, but our new way of putting those on a new line makes it look like it should really be separate paragraphs, or at least bulleted, or something.

Also, the new sentence added by P1169R4 static operator() seems like it's not really part of that paragraph, should it be split into a separate paragraph? With the current formatting it looks like it's only applicable to the last "sub-paragraph" of p6, about derived-to-base conversions, but it's not.

Activity

tkoeppe

tkoeppe commented on Sep 13, 2022

@tkoeppe
Contributor
jwakely

jwakely commented on Sep 13, 2022

@jwakely
MemberAuthor

Spread across two pages:

image

self-assigned this
on Sep 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

    Development

    Participants

    @jwakely@tkoeppe@jensmaurer

    Issue actions

      [over.best.ics.general] p6 is long · Issue #5825 · cplusplus/draft