Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[over.best.ics.general] p6 is long #5825

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5844
Closed

[over.best.ics.general] p6 is long #5825

jwakely opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5844
Assignees

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Sep 13, 2022

p6 is a bit unwieldy ... should we split it up into bullets?

It was always a big wall of text with two notes and an example in the middle, but our new way of putting those on a new line makes it look like it should really be separate paragraphs, or at least bulleted, or something.

Also, the new sentence added by P1169R4 static operator() seems like it's not really part of that paragraph, should it be split into a separate paragraph? With the current formatting it looks like it's only applicable to the last "sub-paragraph" of p6, about derived-to-base conversions, but it's not.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Sep 13, 2022

See https://eel.is/c++draft/over.best.ics.general#6 for the current state.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member Author

jwakely commented Sep 13, 2022

Spread across two pages:

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants