[atomics] Reword table headers, removing mention of "inttypes.h" #584
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@zygoloid: Is this change sufficiently editorial, or will this require a broader discussion? |
tkoeppe
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d6b7400
to
cf63f0c
Compare
tkoeppe
changed the title
tkoeppe
changed the title
|
@zygoloid: PTAL. I can remove the word "corresponding" if you think it's too much, or move it into the table caption (e.g. "named atomic types and their corresponding non-atomic counterparts"). |
tkoeppe
changed the title
zygoloid
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2015
[atomics] Reword table headers, removing incorrect mention of "inttypes.h"
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
inttypes.his not the primary header that definesint_least8_tetc. That'scstdint. The only new thinginttypes.hadds isidivmax_t, but we don't have an atomic version of that.