Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[unord.general, container.adaptors.general] Complete the alias template that appears in the reduction guides #5840

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 21, 2022

Conversation

hewillk
Copy link
Contributor

@hewillk hewillk commented Sep 16, 2022

This looks like neglect of the P1206. Is this an editorial?

…te that appears in the reduction guides

This looks like neglect of the [P1206](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p1206r7.pdf). 
Is this an editorial?
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Sep 16, 2022

Yes, I think this clearly follows the intention of the paper. @CaseyCarter, @cor3ntin could you please take a look?

@cor3ntin
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, this looks fine to me, i missed that sentence when producing the wording.

source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hewillk
Copy link
Contributor Author

hewillk commented Sep 17, 2022

Note that there are two identical iter-value-type in [containers].

Should the iter-value-types in [associative.general] refer to [sequences.general]?

Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand what this paragraph is supposed to achieve normatively in the first place, but the update looks good to me.

Please make sure to squash and fix the commit description, e.g.

[unord.general, container.adaptors.general] Fix list of exposition-only alias templates

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 14a10ef into cplusplus:main Sep 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants