You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found "sequenced after" used in 5.17[expr.ass] but I could not find where it was defined. (I searched N3485. This is the only appearance. )
Would it better to use "sequenced before" to instead, or introduce the term "sequenced after" in 1.9[intro.execution] just like italicized "sequence before"?
PS. I found both "sequenced before" and "sequenced after" in WG14/N1570 5.1.2.3/2 defined as normative terms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From an email to cxxeditor@:
I found "sequenced after" used in 5.17[expr.ass] but I could not find where it was defined. (I searched N3485. This is the only appearance. )
Would it better to use "sequenced before" to instead, or introduce the term "sequenced after" in 1.9[intro.execution] just like italicized "sequence before"?
PS. I found both "sequenced before" and "sequenced after" in WG14/N1570 5.1.2.3/2 defined as normative terms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: