Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LWG 8] P2609R3 Relaxing Ranges Just A Smidge #6137

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

@burblebee burblebee commented Feb 18, 2023

Fixes NB US 39-099 (C++23 CD).

Fixes #6098.
Fixes cplusplus/papers#1271
Fixes cplusplus/nbballot#516

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2023-02 milestone Feb 18, 2023
@burblebee burblebee marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2023 03:10
source/iterators.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/iterators.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/iterators.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@burblebee burblebee requested a review from JohelEGP March 1, 2023 23:33
Fixes NB US 099 (C++23 CD).
This is a fix for the wording in paper P2609R3.

The template is distinct from its specialization, and
"indirect-value-t<T>" is not "the exposition template".
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 3e04431 into main Mar 8, 2023
4 checks passed
@tkoeppe tkoeppe deleted the motions-2023-02-lwg-8 branch May 10, 2023 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants