Closed
Description
This is paper-correct. But there's an inconsistency with the synopsis (which this PR applied faithfully):
Originally posted by @JohelEGP in #6135 (comment)
This is paper-correct. But there's an inconsistency with the synopsis (which this PR applied faithfully):
Originally posted by @JohelEGP in #6135 (comment)
Activity
JohelEGP commentedon Feb 23, 2023
Here's the template-head in [ranges.enumerate], as present in the view and its iterator/sentinel pair.
JohelEGP commentedon Feb 23, 2023
See also #6135 (comment).
hewillk commentedon Mar 30, 2023
Um, any updates?
It seems to me that
range-with-movable-references
may need to be declared in [ranges.syn], which would facilitate a later updated resolution for LWG 3731.JohelEGP commentedon Mar 30, 2023
I just mailed lwgchair to have an issue opened for this.
JohelEGP commentedon Apr 1, 2023
I just used your previously suggested
see below
, like other views do.Dani-Hub commentedon Apr 2, 2023
@JohelEGP Now we have an LWG issue for this: LWG 3914
[-][ranges.syn,range.enumerate] Inconsistent _template-head_[/-][+][ranges.syn,range.enumerate] Inconsistent _template-head_ LWG3914[/+]JohelEGP commentedon Oct 14, 2024