Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[container.alloc.reqmts] Better cross-references for allocator-aware … #6189

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 8, 2023

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

…containers

There are now more allocator-aware containers in the standard than when this subclause was first written, so ensure we have call outs to all relevent subclauses.

The current wording for 'basic_stacktrace' also shows how containers can properly call out the allocator-aware container requirements, now they have their own titled subclause.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Apr 30, 2023

@jwakely, @CaseyCarter Could you please have a look? This looks reasonable to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems an overall improvement to me.

source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need a rebase.

source/containers.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the suggestion from Jens, but it's OK either way.

…containers

There are now more allocator-aware containers in the standard
than when this subclause was first written, so ensure we have
call outs to all relevent subclauses.

The current wording for 'basic_stacktrace' also shows how
containers can properly call out the allocator-aware container
requirements, now they have their own titled subclause.
@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the xref_allocator_aware_containers branch from cd2f30b to 971abf4 Compare September 21, 2023 17:33
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

I think I prefer my suggestion over the status quo, even after a night's sleep.

Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this now has the requested change from Jens, and is ready to squerge.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 646bfb2 into cplusplus:main Nov 8, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants