Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[range.cartesian.view] cartesian_product_view deduction guide should qualify views::all_t #6198

Closed
StephanTLavavej opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6059
Closed

[range.cartesian.view] cartesian_product_view deduction guide should qualify views::all_t #6198

StephanTLavavej opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6059

Comments

@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Contributor

draft/source/ranges.tex

Lines 15047 to 15048 in f24d86d

template<class... Vs>
cartesian_product_view(Vs&&...) -> cartesian_product_view<all_t<Vs>...>;

This says all_t but every other deduction guide says views::all_t; for example:

draft/source/ranges.tex

Lines 8676 to 8677 in f24d86d

template<class R>
reverse_view(R&&) -> reverse_view<views::all_t<R>>;

@cpplearner
Copy link
Contributor

#6059

@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ha, thanks - I checked the current sources and for any pre-existing issues but I didn't check the PRs. 😹

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[range.cartesian.view] Add missing views:: qualifier in deduction guide
2 participants
@StephanTLavavej @cpplearner