Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[range.utility.conv.to] Use model instead of satisfy for range concept #6208

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[range.utility.conv.to] Use model instead of satisfy for range concept #6208

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hewillk
Copy link
Contributor

@hewillk hewillk commented Mar 25, 2023

Is this editorial? If not, is this change worthwhile?

@hewillk
[range.utility.conv.to] Use model instead of satisfy for range concept
0ff11d2 
Is this editorial? If not, is this change worthwhile?
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

This change is not good, I think. This is a place where we want to select different behavior depending on syntactic properties, not check semantic preconditions.

@hewillk
Copy link
Contributor Author

hewillk commented Mar 26, 2023

Close base on the feedback. Thanks for the explanation.

@hewillk hewillk closed this Mar 26, 2023
@hewillk hewillk deleted the main-to branch March 26, 2023 05:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@hewillk @jensmaurer