Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

No \idxhdr index entry for <chrono> #622

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Feb 17, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

No \idxhdr index entry for <chrono> #622

jwakely opened this issue Feb 17, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
@jwakely
Labels
lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Feb 17, 2016

There is an index entry for chrono (the namespace, presumably) but not for <chrono>
@jwakely jwakely added lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent. labels Feb 17, 2016
@jwakely jwakely self-assigned this Feb 17, 2016
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

AlisdairM commented Jul 25, 2016 •
edited

This is addressed as a part of #855 which also catches <any>, <ratio>, and <type_traits>.

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

The fix for this was merged with #861

@jwakely
Copy link
Member Author

jwakely commented Sep 27, 2016

I see an entry for <chrono> in the library name index, but not the main one.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member Author

jwakely commented Sep 27, 2016

There are loads missing from the main one, we only seem to have index entries for the C library headers and some freestanding ones such as <exception>, <initializer_list> and <new>.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member Author

jwakely commented Sep 27, 2016

I've opened #940 for that, this original issue is fixed now.

@jwakely jwakely closed this as completed Sep 27, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jwakely jwakely

Labels
lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@AlisdairM @jwakely