Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new term "constexpr-suitable" #6240

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 30, 2023
Merged

Use new term "constexpr-suitable" #6240

merged 3 commits into from Apr 30, 2023

Conversation

tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

@tkoeppe tkoeppe commented Apr 30, 2023

As of CWG2602 (tkoeppe@ce7d8b0), the term "constexpr-suitable" replaces the previous phrase "satisfy the requirements for a constexpr function".

Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like an improvement. I suggest to apply xrefs consistently.

source/time.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/utilities.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/utilities.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/utilities.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkoeppe commented Apr 30, 2023

Good idea, done!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 79aef51 into cplusplus:main Apr 30, 2023
2 checks passed
@tkoeppe tkoeppe deleted the suited branch April 30, 2023 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants