P2621R2 Undefined behavior in the lexer #6316
Merged
+8
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JohelEGP
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2023
Editorial notes: - Original paper title was: "UB? In my lexer?" - Added a cross-reference.
tkoeppe
force-pushed
the
motions-2023-06-cwg-2
branch
from
ae50c61 to
47dbc58
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original title: UB? In my lexer?
Fixes #6277
Fixes cplusplus/papers#1283
Also fixes cplusplus/papers#1405
Also fixes cplusplus/papers#1406