New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LWG motion 27] P2548R6 copyable_function #6342
Conversation
This also fixes cplusplus/papers#1275. |
Builds are failing during OS installs; how to fix? |
94a521b
to
7db4c34
Compare
\tcode{function}, \tcode{copyable_function}, or \tcode{move_only_function}, | ||
such that the target object \tcode{x} of \tcode{t} has a type that | ||
is a specialization of | ||
\tcode{function}, \tcode{copyable_function}, or \tcode{move_only_function}. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does function_ref
need to be mentioned here (@CaseyCarter, @MFHava)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As the intention was that there should be no double wrapping for "polymorphic function wrappers", I think function_ref
should be mentioned here too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Such a change feels non-editorial to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we open an LWG issue?
7db4c34
to
586e13a
Compare
586e13a
to
8f14cc4
Compare
Fixes #6313.
Fixes cplusplus/papers#1275