Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2510R3 Formatting pointers #6354

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 21, 2023
Merged

P2510R3 Formatting pointers #6354

merged 1 commit into from Jul 21, 2023

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Jun 26, 2023

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2023-06 milestone Jun 26, 2023
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_filesystem}@ 201703L // also in \libheader{filesystem}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_flat_map}@ 202207L // also in \libheader{flat_map}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_flat_set}@ 202207L // also in \libheader{flat_set}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_format}@ 202207L // also in \libheader{format}
#define @\defnlibxname{cpp_lib_format}@ 202306L // also in \libheader{format}
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely Jun 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have several papers from Varna that all bump this macro. LWG and the SG10 chair proposed that we use distinct values for them, to aid implementers who might not implement them all at once. This paper is the smallest and simplest, so the value 202304 would make sense here (and 202305 for P2757R3, and 202306 for P2637R3).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 4c79d59 into main Jul 21, 2023
4 checks passed
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2023-06-lwg-10 branch November 12, 2023 21:26
@jensmaurer jensmaurer restored the motions-2023-06-lwg-10 branch November 12, 2023 21:26
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2023-06-lwg-10 branch November 12, 2023 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2023-06 LWG Motion 10] P2510R3 Formatting pointers P2510 Formatting pointers
4 participants