Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[atomics.order] p11 - Make it recommended practice and rephrase #6380

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

Eisenwave
Copy link
Contributor

@Eisenwave Eisenwave commented Jul 16, 2023

Fixes #6376.

p11 should have been a recommended practice paragraph, and the current phrasing is slightly unclear on whether demands are made only towards atomic stores, or towards both loads and stores.

The proposed wording is a combination of my initial disambiguation, incorporating ideas from @jensmaurer.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit f48f316 into cplusplus:main Nov 10, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[atomics.order] Clarify whether p11 makes demands towards loads, or just stores
2 participants