Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dcl.link] Clarify the intent of CWG2483 #6395

Closed

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

I think this can be an editorial clarification. Otherwise, it seems to me that nothing has been resolved in CWG2483.

Fixes cplusplus/CWG#368.

Co-authored-by: xmh0511 <970252187@qq.com>
@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing as this is unwanted.

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the clarify-cwg-2483 branch July 23, 2023 05:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[dcl.link] p5 The extent of the ignore for class member
1 participant