[temp.point] Itemize some paragraphs #6405
Open
+31
−18
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JohelEGP
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2023
|
Also I think we can compactify the wording: the point of instantiation of the specialization is
-the point of instantiation of the enclosing specialization if
+that of the enclosing specialization ifPerhaps that's for another PR though. |
|
@tkoeppe can you take a look? |
jensmaurer
reviewed
Mar 28, 2025
Eisenwave
force-pushed
the
temp-point-items
branch
from
721bbea to
b139a49
Compare
|
Implemented all the suggestions and rebased. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Paragraphs in [temp.point] (p1, p3, p4) are notorious in the C++ community for being long and hard to read.
This edit itemizes them, turning them from one huge prose sentence into something more organized. The actual text is almost the same 1:1, just reordered so that it makes sense as a list.
I've asked for feedback from users familiar with the C++ standard on a programming Discord: