[optional.optional] Remove qualified destructor calls, refactor postconditions of swap
CWG1089
#6416
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
val->T::~T()
should beval->~T()
(the former breaks ifT
has a member namedT
), but considering that 'destroys the contained value' is already sufficiently clear in its meaning, I don't see why explicitly specifying the syntax for a (pseudo-)destructor call is necessary at all.This PR also changes the presentation of postconditions in [optional.swap] by moving them out of the 'Effects' table.