Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move removal of bool++ from C++14 compatibility annex to C++17 annex #646

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 18, 2016

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

This change was clearly introduced in C++17, at the same meeting
as removing the meaning of the register keyword. I can see no
Core issue tied to this removal being resolved as a DR against
14 or earlier.

I have confirmed that paper p0002r1 applied this to the C++17
annex, but was listed as a change in annex D rather than clause
5 - the latter change seeming the consistent editorial policy
for removed Core features, so retained.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 16, 2016

The commit message should start with "[compatibility]". (That can be fixed in merging, but it would expedite the process if you amended it yourself.)

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks - my first pull request and I was not aware of the conventions, are they documented somewhere that I missed?

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Mar 16, 2016

I don't think so, but that's the format used in most of the existing commit log messages.

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, I'll check the log for precedent and update my commit message when I'm home from the office tonight. I'd rather clean this up myself now, so I am better educated for future pull requests.

…ex to C++17 annex

This change was clearly introduced in C++17, at the same meeting
as removing the meaning of the register keyword.  I can see no
Core issue tied to this removal being resolved as a DR against
14 or earlier.

I have confirmed that paper p0002r1 applied this to the C++17
annex, but was listed as a change in annex D rather than clause
5 - the latter change seeming the consistent editorial policy
for removed Core features, so retained.
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, following the log, I may have got it wrong again, but I retitled with the stable-ref of the clause that I changed - better?

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 17, 2016

Looks great, thanks!

zygoloid added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2016
[diff.cpp11.expr] Move removal of bool++ from C++14 compatibility annex to C++17 annex
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit 819ec29 into cplusplus:master Mar 18, 2016
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the bool_plusplus_in_17 branch April 16, 2016 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants