Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

References to tables in Clause 28 should use "Table" not "table" #647

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

References to tables in Clause 28 should use "Table" not "table" #647

jwakely opened this issue Mar 17, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Mar 17, 2016

e.g. 28.5.1 [re.synop] says "has the effects listed in table 155" but elsewhere references to tables use an uppercase T.
@jwakely jwakely added the tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent. label Mar 17, 2016
@burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

This is a general problem elsewhere in the spec for which I was about to open a github issue for. OK to just tackle them all in this issue? If not, please open an issue for the general case.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member Author

jwakely commented Apr 13, 2016

I agree it makes sense to do it all under this issue.

payload added a commit to payload/draft that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2016
@payload
[whole standard] fix typos (cplusplus#647)
385e6c5 
* [re.synopt, string.view.cons, string.view.comparison] table~/ref -> Table~/ref
* [expr.new] annex~/ref -> Annex~/ref
* [utility.arg.requirements] tables~/ref -> Tables~/ref
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

This seems to be fixed as of now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
tiny An issue with a small change; with "cwg" label: can be applied editorially after CWG consent.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jwakely @burblebee @jensmaurer