Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[intro.memory] Replace fields with members #6480

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[intro.memory] Replace fields with members #6480

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Eisenwave
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #5544 (in part).

jensmaurer
jensmaurer requested changes Aug 26, 2023
View reviewed changes
source/basic.tex
@@ -3099,8 +3099,7 @@
inside a nested struct declaration and the other is not, or if the two are
separated by a zero-length bit-field declaration, or if they are separated by a
non-bit-field declaration. It is not safe to concurrently update two bit-fields
in the same struct if all fields between them are also bit-fields of nonzero
width.
in the same struct if all members between them are also bit-fields of nonzero width.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bit-field of zero width is not a (data) member, so I think this is semantics-changing if we assume "fields" includes bit-fields of zero width.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jensmaurer jensmaurer jensmaurer requested changes

@jwakely jwakely jwakely approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Stop talking about fields
3 participants
@Eisenwave @jwakely @jensmaurer