You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A user-declared \term{copy} assignment operator \tcode{X::operator=} is a
Why is this a seemingly defining copy as a term? Shouldn't it be pure prose, or defining copy assignment operator as a term?
Also, there are hyphenation issues throughout the document. Sometimes (though this is the vast minority), the hyphenated terms copy-assignment and move-assignment are used. This should be made uniform.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see, so in #556 (comment), it was voted that the whole term should be defined, not just \term{copy}.
If the whole term was defined, then the definition would also clarify that the non-hyphenated version should be used elsewhere to match the definition.
draft/source/classes.tex
Line 1663 in 1c22d62
Why is this a seemingly defining copy as a term? Shouldn't it be pure prose, or defining copy assignment operator as a term?
Also, there are hyphenation issues throughout the document. Sometimes (though this is the vast minority), the hyphenated terms copy-assignment and move-assignment are used. This should be made uniform.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: