Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[class.copy.assign] Definition and hyphenation issues #6498

Closed
Eisenwave opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[class.copy.assign] Definition and hyphenation issues #6498

Eisenwave opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Eisenwave
Copy link
Contributor

A user-declared \term{copy} assignment operator \tcode{X::operator=} is a

Why is this a seemingly defining copy as a term? Shouldn't it be pure prose, or defining copy assignment operator as a term?

Also, there are hyphenation issues throughout the document. Sometimes (though this is the vast minority), the hyphenated terms copy-assignment and move-assignment are used. This should be made uniform.

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #556.

@Eisenwave
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see, so in #556 (comment), it was voted that the whole term should be defined, not just \term{copy}.

If the whole term was defined, then the definition would also clarify that the non-hyphenated version should be used elsewhere to match the definition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants