Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[atomics] Reword preconditions on memory_order values in a positive form #6519

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[atomics] Reword preconditions on memory_order values in a positive form #6519

merged 1 commit into from Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #6511

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2023
Closed
Dani-Hub
Dani-Hub approved these changes Aug 27, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Dani-Hub Dani-Hub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Aug 29, 2023

Thanks, everyone!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 837d6c9 into cplusplus:main Aug 29, 2023
2 checks passed
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c64 branch September 5, 2023 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Dani-Hub Dani-Hub Dani-Hub approved these changes

@jwakely jwakely jwakely approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[atomics.types.operations] p7 What if the supplied arguments does not denote any enumerator?
4 participants
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe @Dani-Hub @jwakely