You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The [cpp] section talks about "identifier"s frequently; often in a context where direct statements about grammar and macro expansion are made.
It would be appropriate to use \grammarterm{identifier} in many more places. For example:
A preprocessing directive of the form
#undefidentifiernew-line
causes the specified identifier no longer to be defined as a macro name. It is ignored if the specified identifier is not currently defined as a macro name.
Yes, that's a heritage from C where grammar non-terminals are/were directly used as prose terms. I'm not surprised the preprocessor section is particularly visible offender.
The [cpp] section talks about "identifier"s frequently; often in a context where direct statements about grammar and macro expansion are made.
It would be appropriate to use
\grammarterm{identifier}
in many more places. For example:- [cpp.scope] p2
This is one of the more extreme cases: statements directly about grammar rules are made, but "identifier" is not formatted as a grammatical term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: