Skip to content

[res.on.exception.handling] Use \grammarterm instead of informal term #6547

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

Eisenwave
Copy link
Member

The term "exception handler" isn't formally defined anywhere. It would be better to use the grammatical term handler, which is defined.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe requested a review from jensmaurer November 10, 2023 03:56
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Icing on the cake: add xref to [except.handle] or so.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 18, 2023

@Eisenwave Could you apply Jens's suggestion?

@Eisenwave Eisenwave force-pushed the fix-lib-intro-handler branch from 0e70215 to 1b70409 Compare December 18, 2023 20:50
@Eisenwave
Copy link
Member Author

@jensmaurer I'm not 100% sure if I put it in the place you've envisioned. Also I assume you mean \ref, not \xref.

@JohelEGP

This comment was marked as resolved.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 18, 2023

I think it should be \iref. Jens meant "xref" as a shorthand for "cross reference", but the relevant macro is \iref. (The \xref macro is something else.)

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
Eisenwave Jan Schultke
…and add ref
@Eisenwave Eisenwave force-pushed the fix-lib-intro-handler branch from 1b70409 to faaedf5 Compare December 18, 2023 21:47
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 7675c4c into cplusplus:main Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants