Surely the right thing would be to fix the filesystem grammar name rather than meddle with the fundamental object model?

Also, why doesn't the filesystem grammar get indexed? Maybe it's missing from the list of indexable files.

Oh, I see, the grammar in iostreams.tex is "non-copied". In that case I think this is NAD.

The thing is, as far as I can see, there is no "name" grammar rule other than the one in [path.generic]. So even if we convince ourselves that it doesn't really refer to that one, then what does it refer to? :)

For consistency with the rest of the paragaph it should use \term{name}, rather than simply dropping all formatting from that word.

Yes, I can see that. Maybe the commit should be phrased like 5c8435c

And clearly it refers to the definition of "name" in Clause 3, as indicated by the cross-reference.

Thanks, that makes sense. Updated branch

Much better, thanks!