[intro.defs, dcl.init.list] Move definition of direct-non-list-init #6623
Conversation
Partially fixes ISO/CS-11 (C++23 DIS).
|
The other terms "direct-list-initialization" etc. are already defined there, and the connection between "foo-initialization" and "x is foo-initialized" or "foo-initializes x" are never spelled out anyway, nor do we pervasively make cross-references to the other definitions of "foo-initialization". This seems to make it no worse to also have "direct-non-list-initialization" defined in that place. |
|
On 2023-10-14, at 2:08 PM, Jens Maurer ***@***.***> wrote:
<snip>
⬇️ Suggested change
-Direct-initialization that is not direct-list-initialization is called
+Direct-initialization that is not list-initialization is called
Please adjust: s/is called/is termed/
(or equivalent, e.g., "is known as").
Thank you.
|
Co-authored-by: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer@gmx.net>
We say "is called" everywhere else before, too. I think if we don't like that, this should be a separate (editorial) issue. Care to file one? |
Related: #3515. |
|
On 2023-10-14, at 2:33 PM, Thomas Köppe ***@***.***> wrote:
We say "is called" everywhere else before, too. I think if we don't like that, this should be a separate (editorial) issue. Care to file one?
|
Partially fixes ISO/CS-11 (C++23 DIS).