Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cpp.replace] Remove a bogus grammar term #666

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 31, 2016

Conversation

AaronBallman
Copy link
Contributor

function-like and object-like were being defined as grammar terms when they are not, and this is confusing with the term of art definitions in p10.

@@ -592,18 +592,15 @@
An identifier currently defined as an
\indextext{object-like macro|see{macro, object-like}}%
\indextext{macro!object-like}%
\grammarterm{object-like}
macro may be redefined by another
object-like macro may be redefined by another
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a parenthetical "(see below)" to each of these uses preceding the definition. Please also convert the \grammarterms on lines 668 and 692 to \defns.

@AaronBallman
Copy link
Contributor Author

0b1e789 should be updated properly (and squashed with previous commit).

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit e1e653d into cplusplus:master Mar 31, 2016
zygoloid referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2017
The introduction of 'concept' to two lists of entities in [basic] was
omitted, since these lists already include the more general 'template'.

[expr.prim.req.compound] Fix example to not be ill-formed due to an
unsatisfiable concept.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants